kode adsense disini
Hot Best Seller

The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses

Availability: Ready to download

Anyone can master the fundamentals of game design—no technological expertise is necessary. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses shows that the same basic principles of psychology that work for board games, card games and athletic games also are the keys to making top-quality video games. Good game design happens when you view your game from many different perspectives, Anyone can master the fundamentals of game design—no technological expertise is necessary. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses shows that the same basic principles of psychology that work for board games, card games and athletic games also are the keys to making top-quality video games. Good game design happens when you view your game from many different perspectives, or lenses. While touring through the unusual territory that is game design, this book gives the reader one hundred of these lenses—one hundred sets of insightful questions to ask yourself that will help make your game better. These lenses are gathered from fields as diverse as psychology, architecture, music, visual design, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, writing, puzzle design, and anthropology. Anyone who reads this book will be inspired to become a better game designer—and will understand how to do it.


Compare
kode adsense disini

Anyone can master the fundamentals of game design—no technological expertise is necessary. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses shows that the same basic principles of psychology that work for board games, card games and athletic games also are the keys to making top-quality video games. Good game design happens when you view your game from many different perspectives, Anyone can master the fundamentals of game design—no technological expertise is necessary. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses shows that the same basic principles of psychology that work for board games, card games and athletic games also are the keys to making top-quality video games. Good game design happens when you view your game from many different perspectives, or lenses. While touring through the unusual territory that is game design, this book gives the reader one hundred of these lenses—one hundred sets of insightful questions to ask yourself that will help make your game better. These lenses are gathered from fields as diverse as psychology, architecture, music, visual design, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, writing, puzzle design, and anthropology. Anyone who reads this book will be inspired to become a better game designer—and will understand how to do it.

30 review for The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses

  1. 4 out of 5

    Michael Burnam-Fink

    On one level, this is a textbook about how to design a game. On another level, this a work of love by someone who clearly understands why games are fun, and how to manage the tricky business of coordinating all the people required to build one. Jesse Schell breaks games down into their individual components, and explains how those can work together to reinforce an experience of fun. The book is full of practical, folksy wisdom on managing artists, programmers, playtesters, and clients. A charmin On one level, this is a textbook about how to design a game. On another level, this a work of love by someone who clearly understands why games are fun, and how to manage the tricky business of coordinating all the people required to build one. Jesse Schell breaks games down into their individual components, and explains how those can work together to reinforce an experience of fun. The book is full of practical, folksy wisdom on managing artists, programmers, playtesters, and clients. A charming, conversational book full of hard advice and useful ideas. A good read for anybody who loves games, and essential for somebody who plans to design one.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Graham Herrli

    This book contains some thought-provoking suggestions about game design, but it also contains enough empty truisms to become annoying. For example: "there were many decisions the designer made to lay it out, and these decisions made a significant impact upon the game experience" (p. 237). The final paragraph of each chapter and subchapter could probably be omitted without removing any information from the book. And the number of typos was astounding. (I sent Jesse Schell a list of nearly twenty t This book contains some thought-provoking suggestions about game design, but it also contains enough empty truisms to become annoying. For example: "there were many decisions the designer made to lay it out, and these decisions made a significant impact upon the game experience" (p. 237). The final paragraph of each chapter and subchapter could probably be omitted without removing any information from the book. And the number of typos was astounding. (I sent Jesse Schell a list of nearly twenty to correct in e-books or reprintings.) Their sheer volume made me a bit dubious of the depth of thought that went into the book. Some parts of it, especially the emotional ramblings toward the end, read like first drafts. The premise of the book intrigued me. Schell pulled together a collection of one hundred "lenses": ways looking at a game to see what needs to be changed about it. Some of these could be quite useful, although most don't need the surrounding context of the book to support them. The book has a companion Deck of Lenses that might make a better purchase for anyone actually intending to use the lenses for a design. As a former professional juggler and former employee of Disney, Schell's perspective on the entertainment side of the industry was valuable, albeit somewhat trite. Here are some things this book says: (view spoiler)[ *Compared with other media, it is harder to hide the artifacts and connect the user directly to the experience in games because games are more interactive (p. 11). *The lack of standardized definitions in game design means that we have to clarify what we mean more. Although this step of clarification slows the process, it also means that we think about each detail more thoroughly (p. 25). [This concept reminds me of the essay about Short Hand Abstractions from This Will Make You Smarter. By using SHAs, we can think about combinations of SHAs faster, but we don’t stop to consider what each SHA really means.] *Schell proposes a ten-part definition of a game (they are entered willfully, have goals, have conflict and rules, can be won and lost, are interactive, have challenge, and create their own internal value to engage players in closed, formal systems)(p. 31-4). He then combines all these as “A game is a problem-solving activity, approached with a playful attitude” (p. 37). *The four main components of a game (mechanics, story, aesthetics, and technology) (p. 41-3) should support a unified theme (p. 53). *When brainstorming, numbering the ideas in lists helps to give each idea individual significance (p. 71). *Games are built on top of toys. One way of designing is to come up with the toy first and let that inspire the form of the game (p. 90). *In much the same way that comics simplify perception by aligning with our mental models (with large faces and lines dividing objects), games may be fun because they are simplified models and thus require less thought than non-abstracted perceptions of reality (p. 117). *When designing a game’s mechanics, it’s worthwhile to consider separately the six basic elements of spaces, modes, actions, rules, skills, and chances (p. 130-69). *Playtest with a mix of novices and experts to ensure that players begin in and remain in the flow channel (p. 177-8). *Each individual game element should serve as many purposes as possible. Elements with few purposes should be merged (p. 197-8). *If a game for children is designed to require only one mouse button, it can be useful to set the right-mouse button to also act as a left button so that if their small hands mis-click, the game still responds as anticipated (p. 244). *A successful entertainment experience should have an “interest curve” that begins with a hook to engage the person’s interest and then adds gradually more interesting experiences until concluding with the most interesting (p. 246-52). *Inconsistency in a story world is bad because it takes people out of the world and prevents them from imagining themselves in it in the future (p. 276). *When creating game characters, it can be useful to consider their relationships with each other character, including their relative statuses (p. 318-23). *One technique for designing aesthetics is to pick a song that evokes the feeling you want to convey and then structure the rest of the game around it (p. 351-2). *It’s worthwhile to make your client feel like a creative partner in your design (420). *Schell explains how the education system has many mechanics of a game but that it doesn’t feel like a game because it lacks the elements of a good game design. “It’s not that learning isn’t fun, it is just that many educational experiences are poorly designed” (443). *If curiosity is a trait that can be nurtured, then structuring the education system to support the development of curiosity will be beneficial to students because they can then seek out any information they need on the internet (p. 447-8). (hide spoiler)] EDIT: Jesse responded to the list of typos I sent him by sending me a pack of his Deck of Lenses as a thank you. This was a very proactive gesture and gave me considerable respect for his professional courtesy. Now that I own the deck, my earlier recommendation that the deck is likely more useful than the book still stands. The deck also has the added merit of being beautifully illustrated and satisfyingly crisp. I think it's a good idea to publish the media in multiple formats like this; multiple entries into a world are something which Jesse Schell advocates convincingly for in his book. I've heard that Stephen Anderson also created a complementary deck of psychological principles to go with his Seductive Interaction Design .

  3. 5 out of 5

    George

    My crash course into game design continues. This book is an excellent resource for the whole process of making a game (most of these lessons can also be used for software development in general). It covers everything from the original concept/idea for a game to the end product, with all the hurdles in between (teem communication and organization, testing, balancing, talking to clients...). My only problem is that some of the topics were covered too generally, but I understand that this is the on My crash course into game design continues. This book is an excellent resource for the whole process of making a game (most of these lessons can also be used for software development in general). It covers everything from the original concept/idea for a game to the end product, with all the hurdles in between (teem communication and organization, testing, balancing, talking to clients...). My only problem is that some of the topics were covered too generally, but I understand that this is the only way to do it without making it the size of Encyclopedia Britannica. The four star review is mostly because the writing style didn't sit well with me.

  4. 5 out of 5

    Kars

    I have mixed feelings about this book. To start with the good: Schell takes a very holistic approach to game design. He's also plain spoken, demystifying a lot of the work that goes into making games. On the downside: the range of topics Schell covers in his effort to be holistic leads to some shallow treatments. His insistence on accessibility means things are sometimes dumbed down too much, assumptions aren't examined or (in the worst cases) arguments are based on questionable pseudoscience. I I have mixed feelings about this book. To start with the good: Schell takes a very holistic approach to game design. He's also plain spoken, demystifying a lot of the work that goes into making games. On the downside: the range of topics Schell covers in his effort to be holistic leads to some shallow treatments. His insistence on accessibility means things are sometimes dumbed down too much, assumptions aren't examined or (in the worst cases) arguments are based on questionable pseudoscience. I also found the insistence of turning everything into a lens tiresome. I personally find a list of 100 things to keep in mind when designing unwieldy and ultimately unrealistic. An approach that is at odds with the pragmatic tone of the rest of the book. In summary, I can't think of any game design book that covers this much ground, so it makes a great (if hefty) introduction to the field. However, each separate topic discussed herein is served better by other titles.

  5. 4 out of 5

    Wise_owl

    I read this book mostly because a friend was reading it and game design is something I'm peripherally interested in. That being said, with a few exceptions, I found the book pretty useful. It covers the full range of decisions that go into game design and has tips, or at the book puts it 'lenses' through which you can examine you game. Who is your game for. What is your games 'world'. How do the players inter-act with that world. What are the spaces of that world. It was effective is getting me I read this book mostly because a friend was reading it and game design is something I'm peripherally interested in. That being said, with a few exceptions, I found the book pretty useful. It covers the full range of decisions that go into game design and has tips, or at the book puts it 'lenses' through which you can examine you game. Who is your game for. What is your games 'world'. How do the players inter-act with that world. What are the spaces of that world. It was effective is getting me to look 'under the hood' as it were, and to recognize some of my own gaming decisions. For example, I realized I tend to be attracted to games with strong 'stories' where the game-play isn't divorced from the story or abstracted. I have a few criticisms. Some of the book does feel like it dwells a little deeply in 'gamer' culture. The section in Gender and Demographics made me bite my tongue for it's predictability. Not that the underlaying message; that when you make a game you have to be conscious of the reality of different interest in different demographics, I just think his assertions regarding what those trends are is myopic and a tad ignorant of the broader social factors at play. Over-all I'd recommend the book to those interested in Game-design. It's a pretty easy read.

  6. 4 out of 5

    Rich

    Jesse has to be one of the smartest people I know...and this book is proof. This book is not only a great way to learn about designing games, but teaches a lot of good tips for creating anything. I particularly appreciate that the book is not overly technical (its easily accessible to anyone who would pick it up), but it does go into some complex ideas...he hit that perfect balance in creating a book that anyone, regardless of skill or education level, can read and learn from.

  7. 5 out of 5

    Osama

    This is a life changing book, not as a game designer only, but as a human. For it contains many valuable lessons on the design of human experiences, I would recommend this book to anyone. The last three chapters were the most effecting for me, for they discussed the effect of games and how they can transform us. Once you finish it, you will get a ring, a secret ring, but I can't tell you more. So, go read it yourself :)

  8. 5 out of 5

    Jessica Mae Stover

    Bought the second edition of this book as a gift, and read a few excerpts with the giftee. If you search the reviews here for "gender" and "sexist," you'll see that there are red flags about one particular section, and I urge readers to talk back to that part of the book in your reviews and in your game design. For future editions, it would be helpful if the section in question was handed over to someone else due to the author's limitations and the lack of needed citations, or else omitted entir Bought the second edition of this book as a gift, and read a few excerpts with the giftee. If you search the reviews here for "gender" and "sexist," you'll see that there are red flags about one particular section, and I urge readers to talk back to that part of the book in your reviews and in your game design. For future editions, it would be helpful if the section in question was handed over to someone else due to the author's limitations and the lack of needed citations, or else omitted entirely. I'm not sure if that lens permeates the entire book, but I sincerely hope not since this is the go-to book on game design, and otherwise looks to be well received. A simple test readers and writers can use: Try reading the work with race substituted for gender. If you wouldn't say the thing about race -- if it sounds wrong -- don't say it about gender.

  9. 5 out of 5

    Chris

    This is a fantastic intro to the field of game design. It chooses to be comprehensive instead of detailed, so towards the end, you get some very breezy chapters about working in a team and with clients, for example, and mentions enough biz talk so that you've at least heard the terminology but don't totally get it. I didn't fault the book for glossing over these topics. I was happy that it mentioned them, in a getting-to-know-the-lay-of-the-land way, and I also appreciated that the author clearl This is a fantastic intro to the field of game design. It chooses to be comprehensive instead of detailed, so towards the end, you get some very breezy chapters about working in a team and with clients, for example, and mentions enough biz talk so that you've at least heard the terminology but don't totally get it. I didn't fault the book for glossing over these topics. I was happy that it mentioned them, in a getting-to-know-the-lay-of-the-land way, and I also appreciated that the author clearly wasn't trying to stretch his own knowledge, or lay down rules that wouldn't work in real life. The book spends the most time on the bare essentials of game design from a mostly theoretical point of view, which felt very helpful. I feel that having read this book, I now have the beginnings of a rigorous way of thinking about games, which is really valuable. The gimmick of the book -- here are a set of 100 lenses you can use to think about game design! -- fell a little flat for me, on the other hand. To me they seemed pretty much the same thing as the usual summary you'd find at the end of a chapter in a textbook, which is fine, but not especially amazing. To close: this book, more than anything I have read so far, made me proud to be exploring this field myself, and that is priceless.

  10. 4 out of 5

    Yu Chao

    Pros: A thorough and thought-provoking guide to game design, and many of the techniques and knowledge from the book could be applied to general artistic creation as well as performance art. Cons: After reading this book, I often find myself compulsorily analyzing the design when I'm playing a game, or studying carefully the structures of the plot line right in the middle of a movie or novel...which could sometimes be disrupting.

  11. 4 out of 5

    Zsolt Varga

    Thorought, interesting, useful. From concept to market release with interesting stories and personal tidbits added to make it more fun to read. Highly recommended to anyone interested in tabletop or computer games.

  12. 4 out of 5

    Caroline Berg

    I figured it was about time I read this, having heard such great things about it from other game designers, and it is an excellent book. It should have been a standard part of curriculum in college for my Game Art & Design degree. Honestly, anyone interested in going into game design, be it for board games, RPGs, or video games should spend some time reading this book. However, as great as it is, I still disagree with parts of it. And to be fair, Schell does say in the book to question the kn I figured it was about time I read this, having heard such great things about it from other game designers, and it is an excellent book. It should have been a standard part of curriculum in college for my Game Art & Design degree. Honestly, anyone interested in going into game design, be it for board games, RPGs, or video games should spend some time reading this book. However, as great as it is, I still disagree with parts of it. And to be fair, Schell does say in the book to question the knowledge presented within. The parts that bothered me the most were Chapter 9, which portrays sexist stereotypes as to what games women play and why they play games and Chapter 23 which is unapologetically anti-solitaire gaming. Schell says, "the single-player phenomenon appears to have been a temporary abnormality" - seriously? As an avid solo gamer across all platforms I find this to be a very extroverted way of looking at games. As long as there are introverts in the world, there will be solo games. Not everyone wants to game with friends. As for the rest of the book, it is a veritable wealth of information and would be well worth owning, especially for the lists of further reading material at the end of every chapter.

  13. 4 out of 5

    Tara

    A fantastic book that gave me a lot to think about as I continue to design tabletop games. While it isn't 100% (some concerns with gender, understanding of choice-based narratives, etc), it is overall very useful. I've found ways to apply the contents to my (not game related) day job and other aspects of my life. I definitely recommend reading it, even if you don't agree with everything in it. (I'm not sure how much I'll use the lenses, but the ideas around them are great. And, to echo some of th A fantastic book that gave me a lot to think about as I continue to design tabletop games. While it isn't 100% (some concerns with gender, understanding of choice-based narratives, etc), it is overall very useful. I've found ways to apply the contents to my (not game related) day job and other aspects of my life. I definitely recommend reading it, even if you don't agree with everything in it. (I'm not sure how much I'll use the lenses, but the ideas around them are great. And, to echo some of the reviews, his knowledge at times can feel shallow. As with any textbook--take what is good and explore what seems shallow or unsure).

  14. 4 out of 5

    Holly

    This amazing author find connections in the most wonderfully and seemingly unrelated subjects. I learned many invaluable insights about life in general.

  15. 5 out of 5

    Vladimir

    I found it very insightful and quite fun. Easy to read through.

  16. 4 out of 5

    Bruce

    The Art of Game Design is a fabulous, fun book, a must-read, a wonderful amalgam of philosophy, psychology, criticism, and analysis of games as both literary genre and practical design. Let me hyperbolize further. I think this book should be compulsory reading for anyone in the business of communicating with others for a living as the advice and insights here speak not just to game designers, but to museum exhibit designers, web developers, filmmakers, educators, politicians, and public speakers The Art of Game Design is a fabulous, fun book, a must-read, a wonderful amalgam of philosophy, psychology, criticism, and analysis of games as both literary genre and practical design. Let me hyperbolize further. I think this book should be compulsory reading for anyone in the business of communicating with others for a living as the advice and insights here speak not just to game designers, but to museum exhibit designers, web developers, filmmakers, educators, politicians, and public speakers. Why should we care about games? Exc epting possibly anthropologists, child psychologists, and Cold War era economic and military strategists(leaving most everybody), I think there is a tendency to view games as a frivolous way to pass the time instead of as what I think they really are, which is as a realtime, behavioral model of a complex system. Games are immersive teaching enviroments that (if they are any good) encourage learners to repeat their lessons over and over until they achieve mastery. Players will remember more information for a longer period of time through repeated, volitional exposure. Take chess and Go as models of medieval war. Among other lessons, those who play them enough to absorb their built-in patterns are likely to see the interrelationship of offense and defense (in chess) and the impact of position on territorial influence or control (in Go). Wonder whether Liddell Hart, Klausewitz, or Sun Tzu have the upper hand when it comes to battle or negotiating tactics? Watch football and find out which plays leave their opponent flatfooted (game, set, match to the deception and surprise advocated by Liddell Hart and Sun Tzu). Care to study the effects of cooperation and competition in a problem-solving context? Grab a buddy and play a round of Joust. Want to (safely) explore the risks of possible futures with other like-motivated people in the hopes of building a better tomorrow? Watch or participate in Superstruct online. As with everything, there are good and bad games, and as a person who likes to get under the hood and see what drives the success of different experiences, Art of Game Design delivers without didacticism. Neither highbrow nor how-to, Schell’s authorial voice is fun-NY throughout (I found myself intermittently laughing out loud reading it, no doubt to the consternation of those around me). For example, he-e-ere's Jesse at page 391on the necessary agonies of playtesting as a means of eliciting constructive criticism: “Having people hate your work is probably one of the most painful parts of being a game designer. And playtesting is like an engraved invitation that reads: You are cordially invited to tell me why I suck Bring a friend – Refreshments Served” Ba-DUMP-bump! These jokes leaven and underscore the importance of repeated testing of one's assumptions, a point made further by photographic metaphor, a picture of a banana all over whose peel is written the words, “I AM A APPLE!!!” [sic] More than a game designer's or software developer's truism, the value of iteration (what Schell calls "the rule of the loop," my parents call "the bloody forehead school, " and most everyone else calls "trial and error") is a life-lesson in favor of defining reality through empiricism in preference to opinion. In my view, the book has only three weaknesses. First, and despite the fact that internal contents are themselves rigorously, coherently organized, each chapter is preceded by an opaque and superfluous road map (ostensibly a diagram that shows how designers, games, and players – and their constituent components – quasi-relate to one another in the context of the book). Second, the first thirty pages or so – which seek to define, parse, or analyze basic terms and concepts as well as set an unnecessarily folksy voice – may try your patience, unless you think reading the sentence “I am a game designer” repeatedly in boldface with each word italicized in turn makes for a meaningful reading-mantra. Finally, while Schell has something substantive to say about pretty much everything ranging from the influence of audiovisual cues on human behavior to the fine art of pitching a game in a way that prospective funders will be most likely to care about, he nonetheless gives really short shrift to technology. In less than ten pages Schell distinguishes foundational technology (Wiimote, strong) from decorational technology (if I score enough points, I can post my photo to the leaderboard, weak), and balances the risks of premature adoption of the latest, greatest (and untested) thing against premature dismissal of emergent technologies that (upon maturity) could threaten a game with obsolescence. However, Schell deliberately eschews mention, let alone discussion, of the pros, cons, or even bare consequences imposed by the deployment of generic game technologies (e.g., dice, cards, balls, rudimentary physics engines, polygonal rendering algorithms, etc.). So curious geeks and hardcore techies will need to supplement their reading. In all other respects Art of Game Design is comprehensive, including 100 “lenses” through which designers might view their work. Each “lens” (also published separately as a card pack!) is really a series of provocative questions that promote introspection. For example, the lens of flow (#18, p. 122, concluding a synopsis of research findings from studies performed by psychologist Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi and others) challenges designers to balance a growing level of challenge to a growing level of skill, maximizing the relevance of player actions to intended goals while minimizing distractions (a term explicitly defined and disambiguated). Meanwhile, the lens of status (#80, p. 323) borrows from improvisational theater to promote development of more sophisticated characters and character interactions by assuring that game characters behave in accordance with (and constantly jockey to establish and evolve) their relative, respective social status. This is also a book chock full of fascinating cultural references (including illustrative quotes from Confucius, Plato, Scott McCloud, They Might Be Giants, and the Dalai Lama), anecdotes (How did Michelangelo come into his David commission? Whose gambling problem prompted Pascal and Fermat to develop the laws of probability? How did “Space Invaders” come into being?), and aphorisms (“A game is a problem-solving activity approached with a playful attitude” – p. 37; “A puzzle is a game with a dominant strategy” – p. 209; “Power is the ability to get what you want” – p. 424). For me, introductions to Christopher Alexander’s views on architecture and the concept of “griefers” and “griefing” (i.e., minimizing any game/activity’s potential to be exploited as an expression/outlet of active or passive aggression unrelated and inappropriate to the game) were wholly welcome surprises that have me actively seeking out the former from my library (and casually avoiding the latter, as it would not otherwise have occurred to me that online game players might invest time and effort arranging virtual furniture to spell out obscenities). There's much, much more here that I haven't covered, including analyses of gender, age, Aristotelian interest curves, and the virtue of a good juggling routine. (Among other topics that have bearing on good game design.) But I'm probably already over my GoodReads limit, so you can stop reading my review and start reading this book.

  17. 4 out of 5

    Nichi

    I've had an interest in game design for quite awhile but have never read a book on the topic (having misses that they even exist). So this is my first read on the subject, but I think it's a good one. Schell addresses a lot of problems I wouldn't have thought of, at least not without designing many more games. Many or most sections left me with something to think about. While the book presents a stack of a hundred odd lenses, the whole comprises another lens to view everything else through. That I've had an interest in game design for quite awhile but have never read a book on the topic (having misses that they even exist). So this is my first read on the subject, but I think it's a good one. Schell addresses a lot of problems I wouldn't have thought of, at least not without designing many more games. Many or most sections left me with something to think about. While the book presents a stack of a hundred odd lenses, the whole comprises another lens to view everything else through. That is, thinking along with this text has left me with a unique way to think about non-game things. Some other reviews complain about the lack of depth in some areas. At six hundred pages, it seems to have the right feel for an introduction. Every chapter has some suggested further readings, many of which sound interesting.

  18. 5 out of 5

    Laura

    I would recommend this book to anyone who wants to do Game Design or has started to do Game Design or even who has worked in that field for two or three years to recap and add to what is already known. He gives a good overview over all the tasks a Game Designer has to takle. The lenses with their questions are good guidelines for the design process and the advice he gives is very useful and novel compared to other Game Design books. Practical. The book is already quite long so obviously he could I would recommend this book to anyone who wants to do Game Design or has started to do Game Design or even who has worked in that field for two or three years to recap and add to what is already known. He gives a good overview over all the tasks a Game Designer has to takle. The lenses with their questions are good guidelines for the design process and the advice he gives is very useful and novel compared to other Game Design books. Practical. The book is already quite long so obviously he couldn't go in depth too much (he always notes when there is more to a topic which can be found in books with more specific topics like balancing the economics of a game, game narratives, technology and so on). I studied Game Design and have been designing games for some years now, but still I learned something from reading this. Got some new perspective and techniques. Very good read!

  19. 4 out of 5

    Aaron

    2.5-3. This is an approachable book on a very complicated topic, but Schell's organization is overly specific and the use of "lenses" gets ridiculous after a while. I think the main value in this book is using it as a reference when making games. Need to check yourself on mechanics? Here's five ways to analyze them. I found myself constantly skimming or skipping paragraphs or chapters because Schell would explain a point in the first three sentences, then beat it into the ground for the next sev 2.5-3. This is an approachable book on a very complicated topic, but Schell's organization is overly specific and the use of "lenses" gets ridiculous after a while. I think the main value in this book is using it as a reference when making games. Need to check yourself on mechanics? Here's five ways to analyze them. I found myself constantly skimming or skipping paragraphs or chapters because Schell would explain a point in the first three sentences, then beat it into the ground for the next several pages. I don't know who needs this much redundant explaining, but I guess this is a book for them. Not bad, not fantastic. A good primer if you can stand the style.

  20. 5 out of 5

    Adam Omgitsreallyhim

    Definitely a must read for a game designer OR a fan of video/board games. While it doesn't go too much into any technicalities, each chapter provides you numerous 'lenses' on how to look at the various aspects of game design, starting with chosing a theme to the business and production side of things. By answering the open ended questions the 'lenses' give you, you will polish your ideas more. It is especially good, if you are stuck for whatever reason and you need inspiration or a methodology, o Definitely a must read for a game designer OR a fan of video/board games. While it doesn't go too much into any technicalities, each chapter provides you numerous 'lenses' on how to look at the various aspects of game design, starting with chosing a theme to the business and production side of things. By answering the open ended questions the 'lenses' give you, you will polish your ideas more. It is especially good, if you are stuck for whatever reason and you need inspiration or a methodology, on how to approach your problem.

  21. 4 out of 5

    Charly Troff (ReaderTurnedWriter)

    I enjoyed this book, despite it being a 530 page textbook. Seriously, it was so long, I've been reading it before bed for months. It did have a lot of useful information in it and even though I'm not a game developer, I did get quite a bit out of it. I found a lot of information applied to creation in general, including for my writing. As my husband (a game designer) have had discussions, we've brought up a lot of the principles in this book. It also is organized in a really good way.

  22. 4 out of 5

    Alistair

    I must confess that I skim read this as I thought that it might be more board game related. Video games seemed to take up the majority of the examples and I don’t have a great frame of reference for that as I only dabble in console games. The advice seemed very well thought out and the questions it poses in each chapter will really help those designing their games.

  23. 5 out of 5

    Alexandros Lagios

    This was the first book on game design I have read and I'm really happy with my choice. Although Jesse Schell manages to give pointers on most of the aspects of game design, which means that he can't cover many of them in great depth, he manages to be very insightful and he provides the readers with plenty of useful tools for their game design journey.

  24. 5 out of 5

    D

    This is a clairvoyant take on the forces that shape good games, but Jesse draws large insights that definitely are sure to add color to your thinking outside of the context of gaming too. I think it's meaningful too that his studio continues to do novel work like the Water Bears HTC Vive application, showing that they're able to translate thoughts printed herein into the studio.

  25. 5 out of 5

    Daniel Riveong

    A great read. Jesse's advice and approach to storytelling, psychology, design, and management are relevant for everyone. It is very interesting to read about these diverse subjects from the view of a game designer.

  26. 5 out of 5

    Takahiro Ishikawa

    This is not just about game design, broadly speaking, it's about incentive design to make your creation to gain more attraction and engagement from users. You can apply the principles to any other form of products such as software platform.

  27. 4 out of 5

    Tiffany Taylor attaway

    I have read this book twice now. I love this book and consider it to be the primary reference for thinking about game design at a high level. Anyone interested in game design should read it. It's packed with information but still very accessible.

  28. 4 out of 5

    Llamaark

    This is book is good, it nearly persuades me to design a game. Actually the reason I read it is not because I want to get into that industry, but still, I find inspired after reading it. All knowledge can intercommunicate.

  29. 4 out of 5

    Eleni Vlachos

    Excellent book -- motivational lessons of game design can apply to many change-making pursuits.

  30. 4 out of 5

    Savanna

    Great intro. Some outdated views and long-winded rambles brought down the value for me.

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.